We still need at least one more review to proceed. If any of the PMC members have time, it would be appreciated if you could do a review.
On 2025/01/31 07:47:48 Nicolas Vollmar wrote: > +1 from me > > [X] Download links are valid. > [X] Checksums and signatures. > [X] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist > [X] No unexpected binary files > [X] All source files have ASF headers > [X] Can compile from source > [X] Can verify the binary build > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 23:35, PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hello Pekko Community, > > > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pekko (Core) 1.2.0-M1-RC1. > > > > The discussion thread: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8xk90o9tnr40681od77hysvvlmjcggjy > > > > The release candidate: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pekko/1.2.0-M1-RC1/ > > > > This release has been signed with a PGP key available here: > > > > https://downloads.apache.org/pekko/KEYS > > > > Release Notes: > > > > https://github.com/apache/pekko/pull/1756/files > > > > Git tag for the release: > > > > https://github.com/apache/pekko/tree/v1.2.0-M1-RC1 > > Git commit ID: 425b3f90a04a7f98d57e8eb638b457ca081f0110 > > > > Please download, verify, and test. > > > > I have also staged jars in the Apache Nexus Repository. These were built > > with the same code as appears in this Source Release Candidate. > > I would appreciate if users could test with these too. > > If anyone finds any serious problems with these jars, please also notify us > > on this thread. > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/pekko/ > > > > For sbt 1.9.4 or greater you can add this resolver > > > > resolvers += Resolver.ApacheMavenStagingRepo > > > > Otherwise for older versions of sbt > > > > resolvers += "Apache Pekko Staging" at > > "https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging"; > > > > > > The VOTE will pass if we have more positive votes than negative votes > > and there must be a minimum of 3 approvals from Pekko PMC members. > > Anyone voting in favour of the release, could you please provide a list of > > the checks you have done? > > The vote will be left open for at least 72hrs. > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > To learn more about Apache Pekko, please see https://pekko.apache.org/ > > > > Checklist for reference: > > > > [ ] Download links are valid. > > [ ] Checksums and signatures. > > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist > > [ ] No unexpected binary files > > [ ] All source files have ASF headers > > [ ] Can compile from source > > [ ] Can verify the binary build > > > > To compile from the source, please refer to: > > > > https://github.com/apache/pekko?tab=readme-ov-file#building-from-source > > > > To verify the binary build, please refer to: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pekko-site/wiki/Pekko-Release-Process#verifying-the-binary-build > > > > Some notes about verifying downloads can be found at: > > > > https://pekko.apache.org/download.html#verifying-downloads > > > > Here is my +1 (binding). > > > > Thanks, > > PJ Fanning (Apache Pekko PMC member) > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
