Hi all,

Thanks for the release. I performed the following checks:

[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and signatures.
[x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
[x] No unexpected binary files
[x] All source files have ASF headers
[x] Compiled
[x] Can verify the binary build


+1 from me.

Samuele

> On 26 Apr 2025, at 20:10, PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1 binding.
> 
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and signatures.
> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> [x] No unexpected binary files
> [x] All source files have ASF headers
> [x] Can compile from source
> [x] Can verify the binary build
> 
> On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 at 16:24, Arnout Engelen <enge...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Pekko Community,
>> 
>> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pekko Management version
>> 1.1.1-RC1.
>> 
>> The discussion thread:
>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/38xcnq1n01nvnnh9bp03dyf1g97ndwy2
>> 
>> The release candidate:
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pekko/pekko-management-1.1.1-RC1/
>> 
>> This release has been signed with a PGP key available here:
>> 
>> https://downloads.apache.org/pekko/KEYS
>> 
>> Release Notes:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/pekko-management/pull/419
>> 
>> Git branch for the release:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/pekko-management/tree/v1.1.1-RC1
>> Git commit ID: ed6d97727df92c524e6d10066159d679dd9d053d
>> 
>> Please download, verify, and test.
>> 
>> We have also staged jars in the Apache Nexus Repository. These were built
>> with the same code
>> as appears in this Source Release Candidate. We would appreciate if users
>> could test with these too.
>> If anyone finds any serious problems with these jars, please also notify us
>> on this thread.
>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/pekko/
>> 
>> For sbt 1.9.4 or greater you can add this resolver
>> 
>> resolvers += Resolver.ApacheMavenStagingRepo
>> 
>> Otherwise for older versions of sbt
>> 
>> resolvers += "Apache Pekko Staging" at "
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging";
>> 
>> 
>> The VOTE will pass if we have more positive votes than negative votes
>> and there must be a minimum of 3 approvals from Pekko PMC members.
>> Anyone voting in favour of the release, could you please provide a list of
>> the checks you have done?
>> The vote will be left open until <insert date/time here>.
>> 
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> 
>> To learn more about Apache Pekko, please see https://pekko.apache.org/
>> 
>> Checklist for reference:
>> 
>> [ ] Download links are valid.
>> [ ] Checksums and signatures.
>> [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>> [ ] No unexpected binary files
>> [ ] All source files have ASF headers
>> [ ] Can compile from source
>> [ ] Can verify the binary build
>> 
>> To compile from the source, please refer to:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/pekko/blob/main/README.md#building-from-source
>> 
>> To verify the binary build, please refer to:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/pekko-site/wiki/Pekko-Release-Process#verifying-the-binary-build
>> 
>> Some notes about verifying downloads can be found at:
>> 
>> https://pekko.apache.org/download.html#verifying-downloads
>> 
>> 
>> Here is my +1.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Arnout Engelen (Apache Pekko PMC member)
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org

Reply via email to