I am +1 as well for those reasons. On Sat, 6 Sept 2025 at 18:52, kerr <hepin1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am +1 on this, we can backport or maintain 1.2.x logger, anyway, this is > a open-source project, no hard eol. > > I found some code witch is OK both in Scala 2.13 and 3.3 gives unhelpful > compiling error. To make 2.12 compiles, I spend many time on that, as a > open source project, we should drop some burdens and put our energy other > place. > > In a recent pr, I have to rewrite the code in Java to make 2.12 happy. By > dropping 2.12 , We will have more time to maintain the projects。 > > 何品 > > PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> 于 2025年9月7日周日 上午12:27写道： > > > There is GitHub discussion at https://github.com/apache/pekko/issues/39 > > > > We will continue to do Pekko 1.x releases with bug fixes so Scala 2.12 > > users will not be abandoned. It is just that at some stage, we need to > > simplify the build and better optimise performance for Scala 2.13 and 3.x > > users. > > > > Ideally, any comments should be added to the GitHub issue above but feel > > free to comment here if that option is not open to you. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pekko.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pekko.apache.org > > > > >
