Let's try it: https://github.com/VirtusLab/scala-steward-repos/pull/608

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 11:22 AM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm happy to have us try out using the VirtusLab ScalaSteward bot.
> We can just raise PRs to add repo names to:
> https://github.com/VirtusLab/scala-steward-repos/blob/main/repos-github.md
>
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 at 09:38, Arnout Engelen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Pekko projects currently use a setup with a custom GitHub bot and the
> > Scala Steward GitHub Action. I'm leaning towards retiring this custom
> setup
> > in favour of adding our repo's to
> >
> https://github.com/VirtusLab/scala-steward-repos/blob/main/repos-github.md
> >
> > I found https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24961 that says "It
> can
> > be argued that (..) is this approach more secure" but I'm not sure I
> > understand in what way it would be more secure. An advantage of using our
> > own bot could be that it'd be easier for us to run tweaked versions of
> the
> > logic, but I don't see a strong use case for that.
> >
> > Security-wise, a 3rd party with no write permissions creating public pull
> > request seems hard to beat. The scala-steward action now contains
> > 'compiled' javascript (
> > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-actions/pull/444) which seems
> more
> > tricky. I've brought this up before on Slack and on GitHub comments, but
> > wanted to have it here as well before making the change.
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > --
> > Arnout Engelen
> > ASF Security Response
> > Apache Pekko PMC member, ASF Member
> > NixOS Committer
> > Independent Open Source consultant
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

-- 
Arnout Engelen
ASF Security Response
Apache Pekko PMC member, ASF Member
NixOS Committer
Independent Open Source consultant

Reply via email to