On Fri, 11 May 2001, Bjarni R. Einarsson wrote:
> On 2001-05-10, 20:02:00 (-0700), Doug MacEachern wrote:
> >
> > thanks for the patch! however, Apache::Registry no longer accepts new
> > features. have you looked at Apache::{PerlRun,RegistryNG} ?
>
> No I hadn't - but now I have. Much nicer code - why hasn't it replaced
> Apache::Registry? Is there any reason I shouldn't run it on my server?
it hasn't replaced it simply because we wanted more people to test it and
the interface is still subject to change.
it probably won't replace Apache::Registry in 1.xx, but there will be
something like it for 2.0.
> Ok, attached is my proposition for "Apache::RegistryPretty", which
> is an improvement over Apache::Registry as long as the input code is
> "pretty". :-) I subclassed Apache::RegistryNG and wrote a
> replacement for the sub_wrap routine (modifying readscript wouldn't
> have worked).
>
> This time I documented it. If you like the code, would you please
> take care of submitting it to "the right place" for me, since I
> haven't a clue about CPAN submission rules?
i have not reviewed it closely yet, you might want to post to the main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list where i'm sure some people will be interested in
trying it out.
info on registering/submitting to cpan is here:
http://www.cpan.org/scripts/submitting.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
