On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > modperl_trace_level_set gets called from modperl_cmd.c only if you have
> > PerlTrace in httpd.conf. Of course this case ignores the env var, but
> > there is no other place in the code that calls this func to check for the
> > env setting of MOD_PERL_TRACE.
>
> right, because we have PerlTrace now. not that we can't support
> MOD_PERL_TRACE too.
ok
> > On the related note the following would be very useful when debugging
> > configuration sections and possibly from the code as well, if we provide a
> > hook to change the trace level from code as well:
> > $s->trace_level('d');
>
> that would be useful. though at runtime with threaded mpm, it is not
> threadsafe. but we could make a per-request trace level that overrides
> the per-server.
cool!
> > Now what would be nice to have is to allow the negation of the level, so
> > in httpd.conf one can do:
> >
> > PerlTrace d
> > PerlModule CGI
> > PerlTrace !d
> >
> > Here I want to have a 'd' trace only for a section between two PerlTrace
> > directives.
>
> 'PerlTrace !d' looks like it should remove 'd' tracing.
true.
> if you only want 'd', then use 'PerlTrace d'
see below
> > I think also that this can be improved as well: Currently
> >
> > PerlTrace d
> >
> > followed by
> >
> > PerlTrace g
> >
> > turns off 'd' and turns on 'g' instead of appending 'g'.
>
> why not just use 'PerlTrace dg' then?
you can end up with a long file with various PerlTrace settings. Instead
of scrolling back and forth and remembering what bits very set before, why
not just switching off the unwanted bits?
> > To summarize I suggest to have:
> >
> > PerlTrace [!]all | [!]d[!]f[!]g[!]h[!]i[!]m[!]s | off
> >
> > all turn all on
> > off turn all off
> > d directive processing
> > f filters
> > g Perl runtime interaction
> > h handlers
> > i interpreter pool management
> > m memory allocations
> > s perl sections
> >
> > !, before the letter, turns off the setting for this level, so one can
> > have:
> >
> > PerlTrace dh #level = dh
> > PerlTrace !dg!h #level = g
>
> i'm not seeing how this is useful, why wouldn't you just say 'PerlTrace g'?
see above
> > well if we have !, we can also do: !all (instead of adding 'off' level).
>
> why not just stick with 'off' ?
fine
> > (but if we have off would be nice to replace all with on (or alias) but I
> > understand that it'll break the convention with normal Perl tracing)
>
> an alias would be fine i guess.
>
> > and of course being able to turn levels on and off via $server.
>
> how about something similar to Perl's $^D?
> then you can do:
>
> local $ModPerl::Trace = 1|4; #dg
>
> or
>
> local $ModPerl::Trace &= ~4; #remove 'g'
>
> or
>
> local $ModPerl::Trace |= 4; #append 'g'
>
> there could be constants for the numbers.
sounds cool, but this is only for the Perl side. It should be parallel
with PerlTrace.
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://apachetoday.com http://eXtropia.com/
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
