On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> one question we should rethink is whether to have docs in their own
> modperl-2.0-docs cvs tree on all in a modperl-2.0/docs subdirectory.
>
> i'm pretty sure cvs allows access control so certain people can write to
> docs/ but not ../
>
> the other reason for the split is if we want to release docs more often
> than the rest of the distribution. if docs/ is self contained similar to
> Apache-Test (with its own Makefile.PL, MANIFEST, etc.), one can cd docs/
> and 'make dist' for a seperate docs package. when the modperl-2.0 package
> is built from the top-level it will automatically include the docs thanks
> to MakeMaker subdir recursion. but, it docs live in
> modperl-2.0/../modperl-2.0-docs, we need todo special Makefile.PL magic to
> pick up that directory, which i think will be somewhat messy.
OK, so now Apache-Test doesn't live in modperl-2.0 anymore. I suppose we
can do the same for modperl-2.0-docs and have it a separate rep linked
into modperl-2.0/docs just like Apache-Test does.
I'd like to start laying out the base blocks. So if a separate doc rep is
fine with you folks, can we actually create this rep?
Please create a new cvs group for the docs project (modperl-doc?), which
will include users from the current 'perl' group:
ask,dougm,rse,ix,fdc,khera,richter,sbekman,cholet,brian,dharris,jochen,ged
Also please add a new user (only cvs account) for Perrin Harkins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, so he can work on the templating guide.
Thanks!
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://apachetoday.com http://eXtropia.com/
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
