On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> With a small problem, 'make source_scan' works for me!!!
>
> I've attached the whole thing (and not inlined, since you can generate it
> yourself :)!
>
> I wanted to ask why on my side I seemingly get a better scanning. If you
> look at the snippet below, the previous var names seem to be "badly"
> parsed.
dunno, different cpp output maybe.
> also are you sure that we need to have this kind of diffs?
>
> # !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> # ! WARNING: generated by Apache::ParseSource/0.02
> -# ! Sun Aug 19 10:32:09 2001
> +# ! Sun Aug 26 01:23:32 2001
> # ! do NOT edit, any changes will be lost !
> # !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
it would be nice if the date was not changed if contents are not changed.
> what's the added value of having the date? We can always do 'cvs log file'
> to check the date if in doubt.
the datestamp was added before the tables lived in cvs. and these
tables will be distributed, not everybody will use cvs for modperl.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
