On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> I was wondering whether it'd be better to use File::Path::mkpath in
> genfile and gendir so the test writers won't have to call this sub many
> times if they need to create a dir foo/bar/baz or a file
> foo/bar/baz/test.conf, when foo doesn't exist. Of course in this case
> the cleanup code should use File::Path::rmtree. If you think it's cool,
> I'll send a patch.
+1 for s/mkdir/mkpath/ in both gendir and t_mkdir. however, the cleanup
code intentionally does not use rmtree. it carefully removes generated
files first (created via genfile), then only removes the generated
directories if they are empty. i don't think rmtree provides that
functionality.
also, switching to gendir to use mkpath will require you to add each
subdirectory created to $self->{clean}->{dirs}
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
