Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>yes, but this is a workaround that is ok if you need to set 2 pairs.
>>what happens if you need to set 4 and more? Isn't my 1.5 proposals to
>>fix the problem good?
>>
>
> i was just making a suggestion to get you by for the moment.
> providing proper support would be fine.
oh, then sorry, I didn't understand your intention. thanks :)
But then for me to craft the right patch, which way should I go? Always
have a hash of lists or should I optimize it at the expense of more if's
to turn the value into a list ref only if there is more than one value
to store? I guess it doesn't matter for the build, but we could reuse
the concept in other places as well.
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://apachetoday.com http://eXtropia.com/
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
