> maybe what we should do is have Apache->server_root_relative that behaves
> just like 1.x in Apache::compat and have 2.0's function be named
> Apache::server_root() which returns ap_server_root if fname == NULL and
> calls ap_server_root_relative() otherwise. this would also fix the
> current compat problem that 2.0's Apache::server_root_relative doesn't
> support Apache->server_root_relative.
then you will write code like:
$conf_dir = Apache::server_root('conf');
does it look good to you? It doesn't to me, since you loose the _relative...
It's easy to change server_root_relative, to optionally (via ref check)
accept a class ref as a first argument. Is there something wrong with it?
And then simply provide server_root() which just returns the root.
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
