Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>yes, that's a bug, must be addn()
>>
>
> remind me why we don't just use apr_table_overlay like 1.x does for SetVar?
exactly for the same reason that addn() should be used.
apr_table_overlay uses setn() which will loose all pairs with the same
key but the last one added.
apr_table_overlay:
* for (i = 0; i < barr->nelts; ++i) {
* if (flags & APR_OVERLAP_TABLES_MERGE) {
* apr_table_mergen(a, belt[i].key, belt[i].val);
* }
* else {
* apr_table_setn(a, belt[i].key, belt[i].val);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
* }
* }
of course this function should be better moved to APR.
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
