On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> exactly for the same reason that addn() should be used.
> apr_table_overlay uses setn() which will loose all pairs with the same
> key but the last one added.
>
> apr_table_overlay:
> * for (i = 0; i < barr->nelts; ++i) {
> * if (flags & APR_OVERLAP_TABLES_MERGE) {
> * apr_table_mergen(a, belt[i].key, belt[i].val);
> * }
> * else {
> * apr_table_setn(a, belt[i].key, belt[i].val);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> * }
> * }
that is not apr_table_overlay(), that is apr_table_overlap().
and the current version of overlap uses addn().
i think we should be using apr_table_overlay() just as 1.x does, no?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
