Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >>>>>>"Stas" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>> > > Stas> I've read about all the evils of Reply-To: header (so please don't > Stas> reply with URLs) but I vote +1 for having it set for dev@ list. I'm > Stas> sick of email duplicates. My mailboxes are already exploded :( And > Stas> remembering to remove these is OK if I had to do that all the time, > Stas> but many other lists have this header set, so I don't remember to > Stas> remove the poster from CC. > > add this to your .procmailrc (from man procmailex): > > :0 Wh: msgid.lock > | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache > > And don't mess with reply-to. I vote to cancel your vote.
Hey, that works! I wish that those who advise not to use reply-to will supply a solution for that, like you did :) Thanks a lot, Randal. So no reply-to for dev@ list :) _____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://apachetoday.com http://eXtropia.com/ http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
