On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Randy Kobes wrote: > There is a blib/lib/Lib.pm, which is identical to > blib/lib/APR/Lib.pm. I think what's happened is that the > Makefile.PL in WrapXS/APR/ sees a 'Lib' subdirectory, and, > ignoring the case, treats it like a 'lib' subdirectory and > dutifully copies the files in WrapXS/APR/Lib to blib/lib. I > wasn't aware before that these shouldn't be copied there .. I > guess one solution is to write a MY::libscan to prevent this?
ah, that makes sense. i don't really like the name APR::Lib anyhow, thinking changing it to APR::Util would be the right thing todo. because even if we fixup the test %INC, Lib.pm would still get installed in the wrong place. > This would be neat, but I think Win9? is still too dumb > to understand this ... The '&&' does work for simple > things like > cd .. && dir > but the problem with the above in the Makefile is that it treats > the '&&' as a source file argument to 'cl'. It may be possible to i was suggesting we change the '&&' to ';', does that not work either? > Just for future reference, on Win32 $^O is 'MSWin32'; to tell the > difference between Win9? and NT one can use Win32::IsWin95() > [true for Win9?] and Win32::IsWinNT() [true for NT and 2K], > which come with the Win32 module. ok, thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
