On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote: > ah, that makes sense. i don't really like the name APR::Lib anyhow, > thinking changing it to APR::Util would be the right thing todo. > because even if we fixup the test %INC, Lib.pm would still get installed > in the wrong place.
OK, that's great ... It's actually nice that the problem with %INC was so simple, and remembering to delete the blib/lib/Lib.pm is no problem until that change comes about ... > i was suggesting we change the '&&' to ';', does that not work either? Sorry, I forgot to mention that - ';' is used as a directory separator in PATH. I'm not sure what, if anything, DOS uses to separate commands on the same line ... But even if there was something, I think it would still get confused with the arguments passed to the command, and try to incorporate that character as part of the command ... The DOS shell is really pretty awful ... best regards, randy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
