Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>Since we have a potentially growing number of Util functions, may be >>it's better not to throw all the functions into one namespace? So in >>this case we could make something like Apache::StringUtil or >>Apache::UtilString? >> >>Because if for example you look at APR::Table, it's a util too. >> > > APR::Table all live in the apr_table_ namespace. apr_strfsize doesn't > really have a C namespace beyond apr_, the closest would be APR::String. > probably should be apr_string_format_size(), but i'm tired of renaming apr > functions.
;( >>In any case I'll go with Apache::Util::format_size and later we can >>change it. Sounds OK? >> > > APR:: of course :) > it should be APR::Util::strfsize or APR::String::format_size. OK, I'll go with APR::String::format_size Thanks Doug! _____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
