Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>Nuh, that's ugly especialy considering that this log is going to grow a lot. >> > > i think we should have both a generated file from cvs with complete info > and a shorter summary for use with releases, etc. both Perl and PHP do > this. Perl has the generated Changes and perldelta summary. PHP has the > generated ChangeLog and NEWS summary. Apache's CHANGES file is useless as > far as i'm concerned. too much info for users and too little for developers. > the generated log from with touched files, dates, etc., can be very useful > for developers.
sounds good to me one question regarding 2.0: we should create and start maintaining the user-level Changes file only after releasing the first version, right? _____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
