On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 03:22:08AM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote: > > > > Apache::PostConfig::Whatever > > > instead of: > > > Apache::PostConfigWhatever > > > > that's up to you for your examples. but i personally won't be changing to > > that convention. true facts that another level of namespace eat more > > memory and take longer to lookup,
I don't think the memory cost of another level of namespace is significant. And the extra time to lookup is basically one extra hv_fetch for those cases where the full name is given and the stash isn't supplied. > > personally, i find it ugly. > > also, the more structures in memory the longer it will take for > > perl_clone() to run. You're not planning to do a perl_clone() per request are you? And even so, one extra HV (per module) isn't going to be very significant in the overall cost of perl_clone(). Tim. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
