Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote: > At Fri, 12 Jul 2002 02:26:04 +0000, > Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>>we should continue to support older versions of httpd for as long as >>>reasonably possible. >> >>but what's the reason? why would anybody use an older httpd beta with >>the latest mod_perl? > > > AFAIK from 2.0.35 on, httpd-2.0 has been considered general > availability, which means "stable" in some way. it's not beta anymore. > > >http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3E
Thanks Tatsuhiko, it's just hard to think of Apache not being beta when its API still changes breaking things relying on it. So since you've raised this issue, is 2.0.35 considered the oldest version mod_perl must compile and run with? __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
