Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Sunday, Jan 26, 2003, at 22:28 Europe/London, Stas Bekman wrote:

If that causes a bug, may be this should be fixed in Apache?

That sounds plausible. Perhaps you could bring this up on new-httpd@ for me since I'm not subscribed ;-)
You know that bringing up things on httpd-dev (it's not new-httpd anymore) doesn't really work, as the httpd developers are busy scratching their personal itches or having responsibilities. So, thanks, but not me.

I guess the argument you could use is that if you write out a header with a few line feeds in it, you actually end up writing the body, which isn't what the API is for.
That's true. So now you have a good reason to subscribe to httpd-dev and have this omission fixed ;)

__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to