Re: [Fwd: MakeMaker Is DOOMED!]

[Stas Bekman]

Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:

On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:

Something to consider for mod_perl 2.0. Even though it'll create a dependency
on Module::Build. Any takers?

er, "Using an external utility (ie. make) is the fundamental
flaw."[1].

httpd requires make.  I don't see much point in adding a requirement
when we can't remove the requirement of make anyway.

[1] http://xrl.us/cfy

Not really. Unlike, the first generation, mod_perl 2.0 builds separately from httpd and therefore doesn't have to rely on the same process.

__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]