Randy Kobes wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Issac Goldstand wrote:


(sorry if this repeats  -stupid mail-client cc-ed it to docs-dev, and not
sure if I managed to intercept it)

Randy,
 Any chance we'll see a mp-1.28 binary against activestate perl 804
(5.8.0)?

Issac


Hi Issac,
   The problem with activestate 8xx is that they enabled
USE_LARGE_FILES support, which causes a conflict in mp1 with
Apache Win32 binaries. And it didn't seem easy to fix mod_perl to
avoid this conflict. One could get around this by, eg,
recompiling the activeperl 8xx sources without USE_LARGE_FILES
support, but then I don't think one is guaranteed compatibility
with ActivePerl binaries. But perhaps someone might have
experience mixing binary packages compiled with and without
large_files support on Unix?

that will work only if the application doesn't use any API which happens to rely on variables whose type depends on whether USE_LARGE_FILES is on or off. For example size_t will be different with and without USE_LARGE_FILES. So you may experience in the best case segfaults in the worst case subtle bugs, like we had in the seek() implementation of APR::PerlIO when perl and apr libs weren't both compiled with large files enabled.





__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to