Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
I haven't been following p5p that well lately, but what is the status of 5.8.1-RC4 wrt mod_perl.
I, for one, cannot get RC4 (or bleedperl) to work with worker on 2.0 or 2.1
I thought the problematic hash stuff was removed in RC3?
I built an exact same perl and tried with the latest httpd-2.0 (haven't tried 2.1), but using patch level 20562 and it worked just fine (both worker and prefork). Can you please try with 20562 (it's post-RC4).
You can get the latest patchlevel, using the following:
rsync -acvz --delete --force rsync://ftp.linux.activestate.com/perl-5.8.x ./perl-5.8.1
ok, I just finished doing that, though perl is now patch level 20581. I still see the problem.
after some investigation, I don't think it's perl. if I set PERL_HASH_SEED to some value, everything is ok, and this patch fixes the segfault
--- src/modules/perl/mod_perl.c 6 Aug 2003 06:46:35 -0000 1.175 +++ src/modules/perl/mod_perl.c 11 Aug 2003 13:52:58 -0000 @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ /* check if there is a specific hash seed passed via the env var * and if that's the case -- use it */ apr_status_t rv = apr_env_get(&s, "PERL_HASH_SEED", p); - if (rv != APR_ENOTIMPL) { + if (rv == APR_SUCCESS) {
which seems like a better check anyway.
Sounds good, since this is optional. please commit.
So with this patch everything works just fine without you setting PERL_HASH_SEED? May be it should do:
while (s && isSPACE(*s)) s++;
so, maybe you have PERL_HASH_SEED set in your env someplace?
No, I don't have it.
__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
