On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: > Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > > On Sep 30 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > >> Randy Kobes wrote: Randy, do you think it's going to be > >> hard to fix IPC::Run do the right thing on win32? If > >> IPC::Run is fixed, we don't need to add win32 cruft to > >> our code. > > > > Sorry if I forgot the start of a thread; what's IPC::Run not doing > > right? > > Here is Randy's statement: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl-dev&m=106384457829827&w=2
I tried altering Apache-Test/t/SMOKE to use IPC::Run, but there seemed to be problems, which I wasn't sure were related to how I implemented things, or perhaps issues of the failure of some of the IPC::Run tests (this is no criticism of IPC::Run - a lot of work and thought has been put into getting it to function as well as it does on Win32). However, the docs for IPC::Run mention that it doesn't work on Win9? (given the differences between Win9? and WinNT/2K/XP, this may be a fundamental problem?). So I thought (using Win32::Process) of trying to get t/SMOKE to work on all flavours of Win32. This may not be worth doing in the end, but I thought initially it's worth exploring. -- best regards, randy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
