On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: > Randy Kobes wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Randy Kobes wrote: > > > > > >>Here's a revised set of tests, using Geoff's implementation > >>of Apache::CRLF. This also addresses a couple of earlier > >>comments of Stas - the files used for comparison are now > >>assumed to be found as t/htdocs/perlio/http.pod and > >>t/htdocs/perlio/http_cycle.png. > > > > [ ... ] > > Sorry - I forgot - httpd.pod and http_cycle.png are in > > the mp2 cvs sources under docs/user/handlers/. If these > > files are OK to use, I'll add them to t/htdocs/perlio/ > > in cvs. This will mean adding perlio/ to cvs, if that's > > an issue? > > adding t/htdocs/perlio to cvs is fine. > > adding http.pod and http_cycle.png is not such a good > idea. The problem is that someone will try to read/use > them for other reasons and chances are that both will be > very out of date 6 months from now. Therefore if you can > use a file with your favorite poetry or prose for .pod > (call it .txt then) and small png of a flower that would > be much much better. Also it'd be nice to add not too big > files, as the source distribution is already quite big and > growing. Of course this is different if a big input is > needed for the test. You can use > http://www.google.ca/imghp to find images if you don't > have your own ;)
Hi Stas, That's a good idea - thanks, I'll do that ... I don't think large files add anything to the tests, so I'll go with the small ones. -- best regards, randy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
