On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 11:40, Randy Kobes wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > gozer 2003/10/14 11:23:08 > > > > > > Modified: . MANIFEST > > > Log: > > > A few files were missing from the MANIFEST > > > > > > Revision Changes Path > > > 1.76 +7 -0 modperl/MANIFEST > > > > > > Index: MANIFEST > > > =================================================================== > > > RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl/MANIFEST,v > > > retrieving revision 1.75 > > > retrieving revision 1.76 > > > diff -u -r1.75 -r1.76 > > > --- MANIFEST 14 Oct 2003 18:21:11 -0000 1.75 > > > +++ MANIFEST 14 Oct 2003 18:23:08 -0000 1.76 > > > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ > > [ .. ] > > > +src/modules/ApacheModulePerl/ApacheModulePerl.def > > > +src/modules/ApacheModulePerl/ApacheModulePerl.dsp > > > +src/modules/ApacheModulePerl/ApacheModulePerl.mak > > [ .. ] > > Actually, the src/modules/ApacheModulePerl/ directory, > > and all its files, could be removed - these are a remnant > > of building ApacheModulePerl.dll, which has now been > > replaced by mod_perl.so, built under src/modules/win32/ > > and its files. > > Looking at the build system, there seems to still be code there to build > ApacheModulePerl.dll if httpd < 1.3.15. Is that still the case ?
Yes, it'll still build an ApacheModulePerl.dll if httpd < 1.3.15, but it uses the dsp under src/modules/win32/. The src/modules/ApacheModulePerl/ files aren't used, and in fact aren't included in the CPAN version. > Got to get myself a workable Win32 build system one of those days. It certainly makes one appreciate unix more :) -- best regards, randy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
