On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 10:20:35AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote: > Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> >And indeed this (tested) patch against mod_perl 1.99_10 fixes it. > > Thanks Rafael. In the future please post patches against the current cvs if > possible, as I've already applied a similar fix, though yours is definitely > better. The cvs version already includes a test for this bug. On IRC Rafael said that he believes that his patch solves the problem without needing changes to perl. Is this the consensus view? If so, and if I get confirmation that the hash changes restore binary compatibility with 5.8.0 (without affecting binary compatibility with 5.8.1), I see nothing holding us back from a release candidate for 5.8.2. (Although there will be a snapshot first, hopefully this weekend) Given that short time between 5.8.1 and now, you can infer how much has changed in 5.8.2-tobe :-) Normal service (on the new timetable) will be resumed soon. Expect 5.8.3 in January 2004, and 5.8.4 about 3 months later. (or that's the plan. if people say "5.8.2 now is crazy" enough, then expect 5.8.2 in January, and 5.8.3 ...) Nicholas Clark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
