OK, so 1.29 is out, we can put your patch in.
I know I was +1 before, but now that we're all a bit more enlightened as to PERL5LIB and its implications, I think we ought to reconsider.
my reasons against altering _anything_ about PERL5LIB behavior in 1.0 would be
- altering the existing, stable codebase for little benefit. nobody else has reported using lib separators (":") or wanting arch libs included in, what, 6+ years?
- we probably shouldn't be supporting it at all
just my $0.02. it's not a veto or anything, but I'm really hesitant to play around with this simply because, even though the changes is simple, we still may introduce bugs that hurt existing users of PERL5LIB. and that's not good at this point.
--Geoff
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
