Stas Bekman wrote: > > Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > > > > In which way the support for 5.9.0 is different from the support > > for 5.8.1 ? > > 5.9.0 == 5.8.2-RC1 hashing-wise. meaning that we need to support a whole bunch > of special cases, which don't exist anywhere else. We certainly can do that, > but it's just a lot of mess. I wish Hugo didn't rush to get 5.9.0 before 5.8.2 > was ready. Now 5.9.0 is somewhat between 5.8.1 and 5.8.2.
Yes, you're right. I wish Hugo released 5.9.0 just after 5.8.1, or with backing out temporarily all changes since 5.8.1. > > (I know at least one person who is considering at least semi-seriously > > running 5.9.0 + mp1 in production :-p) > > well, please tell me if we should provide a support for it. I was mentioning mp1. AFAIK it's fine. Oh, after all, just drop the bloody support for 5.9.0 if it's making things too complex. > blead yes, I didn't suggest not to support blead, I meant to suggest not to > support particular blead releases but just the head ;) > > BTW, just finishing smoking 5.6.2 plays very nice with both mod_perl generations. I'm glad to hear that. I'll have to find tuits to finish 5.6.2, but isn't the planet already overloaded those days with new perl releases ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
