Geoffrey Young wrote: [...]
as for your earlier suggestions, I was waiting for stas to comment on them.
I don't have much to comment on these issues. I'm not going to repeat again and again why the separation into multiple modules is important. It may be unimportant to many users, but we aren't going to take it away from those who need the ultimate performance.
Granted we want to make simple things easy and complicated possible. And that's exactly why I've suggested to create another easy layer for those users who don't care about saving a few msecs here and there and don't care about a few hundreds extra k's of memory wasted. Why don't you like that suggestion?
You want to preload all modules, go for it.
You want to preload all $r modules, go for it too. We can provide easy wrappers that will do all that preloading for you. It's just a matter of designing an intuitive API.
It doesn't have to be black or white.
This way everybody is happy and everyone can decide what's the best for them.
The only, but, is that we don't want these wrappers to be used in CPAN modules. Exactly because we want to be able to control what's loaded and what not.
__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
