On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 13:09 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > > As we discussed, instead of trying to use Tie::IxHash behind the scenes > > to order %Location blocks and such, we will recommend users to use Tie:: > > * for themselves like so: > > > > <Perl> > > tie %Location, "My::Tie"; > > > > </Perl> > > > > So, until I get around updating the documentation, I've at least tested > > that tied %Hashes in <Perl> sections do behave proprely. > > +1 after the usual request to fix indentation (perl code in the conf file) ;)
Will take care of this, as my identation skills are weakened ;-) > > > Only problem I > > can think of is that if you use PerlSections->dump, your hash will be > > dumped as a hash, not seeing the tie magic. So next time around, if you > > load your dumped <Perl> configuration, you'll experience hash ordering > > trouble once again. > > why can't we keep the tiedness? Well, how are you supposed to correctly dump a tie'd object so it can be restored by an eval ? > __________________________________________________________________ > Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker > http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com > http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
