I was gonna mention php - I don't remember exactly how they do, but it IS
labelled php4.so (I think libphp4.so)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Philippe M. Chiasson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "mod_perl Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: [mp2] should we use mod_perl2.so instead of mod_perl.so?


> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 13:45 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>Even though there is no ambiguety between mp1's shared lib: libperl.so
and
> >>mp2's mod_perl.so, i think we should use mod_perl2.so, since eventually
we
> >>will have mp3 and also it's possible that there will be mp2.2
incompatible
> >>with mp2. Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > I think it's an excellent idea. +1
> >
> > And we could possibly think of maintaining a sort of mod_perl.so ->
> > mod_perl2.so symlink in the installation process (a-la ld.so)
>
> Why symlink, just use mod_perl2.so as is. we don't include version numbers
> besides the major number, so it's not quite ala ld.so.
>
> We should do what mod_php does, since they have versioning for a long time
> already. I think they just use mod_php4.so, no? I don't have it installed.
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
> http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
> http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to