On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>But isn't apxs.bat is a custom script made by Randy? May > >>be it doesn't include those flags? > > > > > > That's right - I didn't put anything into EXTRA_CPPFLAGS, > > so it just comes back as an empty string. Should this be > > considered (by mod_perl) as an "error"? Or should apxs > > put something into EXTRA_CPPFLAGS, to handle this context? > > It's an error, since apxs tells mod_perl that such flag doesn't exist, which > indicates that something is wrong. I think apxs.bat should at least support > those flags, but return an empty string, if you think they have nothing to return. > > mod_perl didn't invent those flags, it's the apxs that provides them. I don't > know how did you port apxs to win32, but I'd think that you need to look at > apxs to figure out the answer what should be in them. But ideally apxs.bat > should support all the same flags that apxs supports. Otherwise the code > relying on apxs can't be portable.
But the port of apxs that I did does have an EXTRA_CPPFLAGS, it's just that apxs -q EXTRA_CPPFLAGS returns nothing. That's to be compared to, eg, apxs -q FOO_BAR which gives an apxs error. -- best regards, randy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
