Stas Bekman wrote: [...]
are known and Joe promised to take care of them, at least on Solaris:
but not that one:
t/protocol/echo_block.t
I just added it a day before. So it's a new one. But probably related to blocking (bugs?) in Apache 2.0.49.
Actually, no, echo_timeout is the new one. t/protocol/echo_block.t is the old one (just renamed it from echo) with some tweaks, I decided to test first whether we need to set the socket to the blocking mode and not do that if it's already blocking.:
in t/protocol/TestProtocol/echo_block.pm:
# make sure the socket is in the blocking mode for recv().
# on some platforms (e.g. OSX/Solaris) httpd hands us a
# non-blocking socket
my $nonblocking = $socket->opt_get(APR::SO_NONBLOCK);
if ($nonblocking) {
$socket->opt_set(APR::SO_NONBLOCK => 0); # test that we really are in the non-blocking mode
$socket->opt_get(APR::SO_NONBLOCK)
or die "failed to set non-blocking mode";
}I didn't see Carl's feedback yet, so it's hard to tell. But my guess is that Apache reports that the socket is blocking, while it is not. Carl, does that if ($nonblocking) branch gets executed? (hint: add a warn "foo" debug print :)
Any difference for the test failure if you comment out the if call, but leave the code that's inside of the branch? e.g. replace all the above code with just:
$socket->opt_set(APR::SO_NONBLOCK => 0);
which seemed to work before.
__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
