Stas Bekman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>stas 2004/04/28 14:29:39 >> >> Modified: t/conf modperl_extra.pl >> Log: >> - log the reason for the last change: >> http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=29018 >> - tidy up a bit >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.46 +10 -4 modperl-2.0/t/conf/modperl_extra.pl >> >> Index: modperl_extra.pl >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/t/conf/modperl_extra.pl,v >> retrieving revision 1.45 >> retrieving revision 1.46 >> diff -u -u -r1.45 -r1.46 >> --- modperl_extra.pl 23 Apr 2004 00:38:33 -0000 1.45 >> +++ modperl_extra.pl 28 Apr 2004 21:29:38 -0000 1.46 >> @@ -197,11 +197,17 @@ >> warn "END in modperl_extra.pl, pid=$$\n"; >> } >> >> -#For the tied %Location in <Perl > sections >> +package Tie::PerlSection; >> + >> +# the following is needed for the tied %Location test in <Perl> >> +# sections. Unfortunately it can't be defined in the section itself >> +# due to the bug in perl: >> +# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=29018 >> + >> use Tie::Hash; >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]::PerlSection::ISA = qw(Tie::StdHash); >> -sub Tie::PerlSection::FETCH { > > > gozer, do you think we should use a different namespace for this thing? In > case someone decides to have their own Tie::PerlSection? e.g. > s/Tie::PerlSection/ModPerl::TestTiePerlSection/?
Yeah, I guess polluing the Tie::* namespace for the tests isn't quite nice. I'll fix it. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Philippe M. Chiasson m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ GPG KeyID : 88C3A5A5 http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3A5A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
