Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
As both point to the same
memory block. The address of r->info doesn't change.
Due to this fact, I see no point in trying to return the old value in
the set mode.
I suppose that makes sense. I can't think of a reason why you would want
the old value when setting anyway - once you update r->finfo the idea is
that the old data is irrelevant.
Just because you can :) Well, could :)
We could do a full copy when called in the set-mode in non-VOID mode,
but then these two will be not equivalent:
my $old_finfo = $r->finfo;
$r->finfo($new_finfo);
and:
my $old_finfo = $r->finfo($new_finfo);
So it'll be only confusing and error-prone.
yup. so +1 on what you have.
nice work stas.
thanks ;)
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
