Stas Bekman wrote:

>Steve Hay wrote:
>  
>
>>ModPerl-Registry test all OK, but with these warnings twice over (once 
>>from t\closure.t and once from t\perlrun_extload.t):
>>
>>Prototype mismatch: sub 
>>ModPerl::ROOT::ModPerl::PerlRun::C_3a_Temp_modperl_2d2_2e0_ModPerl_2dRegistry_t_cgi_2dbin_closure_2epl::t_cmp:
>> 
>>none vs ($$;$) at C:/apache2/perl5/lib/Exporter.pm line 65.
>> at C:/Temp/modperl-2.0/ModPerl-Registry/t/cgi-bin/closure.pl line 5
>>Prototype mismatch: sub 
>>ModPerl::ROOT::ModPerl::PerlRun::C_3a_Temp_modperl_2d2_2e0_ModPerl_2dRegistry_t_cgi_2dbin_closure_2epl::t_is_equal:
>> 
>>none vs ($$) at C:/apache2/perl5/lib/Exporter.pm line 65.
>> at C:/Temp/modperl-2.0/ModPerl-Registry/t/cgi-bin/closure.pl line 5
>>Prototype mismatch: sub 
>>ModPerl::ROOT::ModPerl::PerlRun::C_3a_Temp_modperl_2d2_2e0_ModPerl_2dRegistry_t_cgi_2dbin_closure_2epl::t_filepath_cmp:
>> 
>>none vs ($$;$) at C:/apache2/perl5/lib/Exporter.pm line 65.
>> at C:/Temp/modperl-2.0/ModPerl-Registry/t/cgi-bin/closure.pl line 5
>>    
>>
>
>Yup, it's because of the reload of the CODE which was deleted. I'm not 
>sure what can be done about these. Some time ago, I've spent a lot of 
>time trying to get rid of those, working with p5p, but it didn't work 
>out. The delete CODE refs (which we do in ModPerl::PerlRun) is as good 
>as it gets.
>
I remember we looked at improving Apache::Reload a while ago to help it 
clean up redefined subs better.  Is that the kind of thing you need?  
Philippe posted a brilliant piece of code at the time to do that.

Even better would be to go back to the Apache::Reload questions and sort 
that out too...

- Steve



------------------------------------------------
Radan Computational Ltd.

The information contained in this message and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this 
message in error or there are any problems, please notify the sender immediately.  The 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly 
forbidden.  Note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those 
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Radan Computational Ltd.  The 
recipient(s) of this message should check it and any attached files for viruses: Radan 
Computational will accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted 
by this email.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to