Geoffrey Young wrote:
ah, now it's clear. it's implemented in 2.0.47, right?
Hmm, 2.0.47 was released a year ago. Do you think we may be should just
drop 2.0.46? I wonder how many 2.0.46 users are out there. Poll the list?
I'm for dropping back to 2.0.47 outright in the next release. IIRC libapreq
requires at least 2.0.47 so we're not alone. poll the user list (not the
dev list ;) and you'll get 1001 different opinions :)
right.
If not we need to add the C compat layer object to the APR.so linking, which shouldn't be too hard to do.
sure, if we don't solve it via 2.0.47.
looks like it's the case:
/* added in APACHE_2_0_47/APR_0_9_4 */ void apr_table_compress(apr_table_t *t, unsigned flags);
Ah, this is a _15 showstopper, we need to cut out the broken support for 2.0.46, make it 2.0.47, and document that. At the moment it just won't compile with 2.0.46.
Geoff, what was the XXX for 0_46 in the code/tests to clean things up?
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
