On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:34:01PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 07:55:25PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > > > >>On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 10:54:13AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote: > >> > >>>Joe Orton wrote: > >>>Thanks Joe. > >>> > >>>Any chance this can be rewritten to find out what syntax to use (2.0 or > >>>2.1) once and not do that repeatedly? This function is the cause of the > >>>slow configuration (too many shell calls), so trying to minimize it > >>>will be a great thing. > >> > >>Why "repeatedly"? Surely since the value is cached it's only done twice, > >>once for apr-config and once for apu-config? > > No, I meant to have two branches: one for 2.0 and one for 2.1, so in case > a call to the 2.0 style apxs returns no value it won't try to call 2.1 > style?
OK, just to be clear: you just want the order reversed: run through the current logic, then try -q AP?_CONFIG if none of that worked? Or are you asking for all the current logic to be simplified too? joe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
