Is it in the upcoming 2.0.51? In which case we may need to subject tests to skip on OpenBSD && apache_version < 2.0.51?
The APR CVS tree has been updated. Since there hasn't yet been an Apache 2.0.51 tag applied, I can't say for sure that it's part of 2.0.51. If the standard is to use the HEAD APR library, then it will definitely be in 2.0.51. Do you know what their policy is for building the Apache distribution tar ball?
No, 2.0.x uses APR_0_9_BRANCH branch. Simply check the 2.0.51-rc whether it includes the fix or not.
TTUL Ken
----- Forwarded message from Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:33:14 +0100 To: Ken Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Unable to set sockets to non blocking on OpenBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:20:30AM -0700, Ken Simpson wrote:
Hi Joe, This patch definitely works. What do I need to do to ensure that the patch is applied to APR? BTW, I have signed an Apache Foundation contributors' agreement.
Thanks for testing it out. The patch has already been applied for the next 0.9.x and 1.0.x releases.
joe
----- End forwarded message -----
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
