>>> Are you trying to say that we should stop deferring the perl startup as >>> you've suggested before? >> >> >> >> no, I think the current behavior of PerlModule is fine, as it works >> sufficiently well for most cases. if we have a way (other than hacking >> together a <Perl> section) to make sure that perl code can run at config >> time as well, then I'm all set. > > > You mean once Philippe does the change in the subject, you are all set? > Or do you need something else? >
if the API you quoted at the start of this thread (and that we had agreed upon previously) is introduced I think we'll be all set, yes. and when that happens I'll port my two directive handler modules for mp2 over to the new interface to make sure they still work - then we'll really know :) --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
