Yeah, that was a very handy func. -Jie

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:

> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:13:27 -0400
> From: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: mod_perl Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [mp2 api] log_reason
>
> Over irc we have decided to dump log_reason. But now that I've looked at
> it, I'm not sure whether we should do that. If you call:
>
>    $r->log_reason("What's the reason?");
>
> you get:
>
> [Wed Sep 22 22:06:23 2004] [error] access to /My__Bug failed for
> 127.0.0.1, reason: What's the reason?
>
> and there is no such equivalent API. in mp1 it was defined as:
>
> #define mod_perl_log_reason(msg, file, r) \
>      aplog_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR | APLOG_NOERRNO, r->server, \
>                  "access to %s failed for %s, reason: %s", \
>                  file, \
>                  get_remote_host(r->connection, \
>                                  r->per_dir_config, REMOTE_NAME), \
>                  msg)
>
> I suppose we could just copy it over and then we don't need the compat.
>
> What do you think?
>
> --
> __________________________________________________________________
> Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
> http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
> http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to