Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> before we go ahead with this I'd really like to get some more opinions on
> it.
My thoughts (off the top of my head):
1) During set/merge/add operations, SV keys and SV values should
be added to the apr_table_t as if SvPVbyte were called on the SV
(instead of just SvPV). I say "as if" because you don't want to
alter the caller's SV. FETCH/get operations should remain just
as they are.
2) libapreq2 has more flexibility than mp2 does to do something clever
with charsets than APR::Table can. If Boris really wants to see
that happen, he should take the discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The C
API for apreq_value_t used to have a charset slot, that was
eventually dropped because it wasn't being used. If he has some
good ideas for it, then we could bring it back in some form, but
this needs to be decided ASAP because once 2.05 comes out, no
further changes to C structs will be possible.
--
Joe Schaefer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
