Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In any case I'm pretty sure that you've already thought about a > great solution and you have an almost working patch. Don't say that > you don't have one :)
The solution IMO, is to do what Apache::Request::Table::new does: keep a reference to the APR::Pool argument in the new APR::Table object's magic list. That ensures the pool will last as long as the table SV does. I'm pretty sure I proposed this idea before, but it met with some resistance. IIRC folks here considered this a bug in APR::Pool, but I say the problem here is in APR::Table. I'd like to see us settle on a course of action first. -- Joe Schaefer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
