Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
while I can easily reproduce the problem with APR::Bucket::alloc_create(APR::Pool->new);
Would it be possible to rename this sub APR::BucketAlloc::create? When I first named it that, I wasn't aware of the APR::BucketAlloc package.
doh! I think you are right. I've missed that bit. I hope our users will excuse us.
+1. The holidays have left me a few weeks behind modperl's trunk. I'll commit the change once I'm caught up (which
may take a few more days), but feel free to take care of
it for me if you'd rather not wait for me to catch up.
I hope I'll manage to do that shortly. I plan to polish the protocols.pod as it's a bit out of date, so this will be a prerequisite.
also it looks that ba has the pool instead, so it was probably a waste to demand the pool object when $ba is passed anyway.
The pool argument to APR::BucketAlloc::create required,
I think. If there's an APR::BucketAlloc::pool accessor,
it's just retrieving a pointer to the pool that first created it.
Agreed. It might still work most of the time, but may be it's not what the user want (though the extra pool argument could have been made optional).
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
