Le 5 janv. 05, � 18:54, Stas Bekman a �crit :
That probably means that Apache installs its own sighandler or
something like that? It certainly shows that a user can't use perl's
ALRM on MaxOSX.
Please post a skip patch?
Sure, but maybe this is also dependent on the version of Perl I'm
running,
MacOSX stock (5.8.1-RC3)
I'll try to find some time to install a recent Perl to test with.
we don't like RCs, since we can't test for those. Any chance to test
with non-RC?
It fails in the same way with MAINT.
Index: t/response/TestPerl/signals.pm
===================================================================
--- t/response/TestPerl/signals.pm (revision 124104)
+++ t/response/TestPerl/signals.pm (working copy)
@@ -32,6 +32,10 @@
# doesn't work under static prefork
if (!$static) {
+ if ($^O eq 'darwin') {
+ skip "ALRM can't be used on darwin", 1;
I believe that should be s|1|0|;
+ }
+ else {
local $ENV{PERL_SIGNALS} = "unsafe";
eval {
@@ -41,6 +45,7 @@
alarm 0;
};
ok t_cmp $@, qr/alarm/, "SIGALRM / unsafe %SIG";
+ }
}
# POSIX::sigaction doesn't work under 5.6.x
+1, you have the commit access, right?
yes.
(the identation is wrong in the original, i'll fix it later).
I believe I messed it up even further with this patch.
I'll go read the coding style guide now.
--
Eric Cholet
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
