Geoffrey Young wrote:
> 
> Perrin Harkins wrote:
> 
>>Over on the Mason list, Shane McCarron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> offered this
>>idea:
>>
>>
>>
>>>For most Mason users who are working in mod_perl, if only the Apache2 
>>>and Apache::compat modules had been retained (Apache2 as a no-op, 
>>>Apache::compat as an alternate name for Apache2::Compat::* constants)
>>>I 
>>>suspect the mason applications would work without change to server 
>>>configurations.  You would obviously need to upgrade Mason itself...
>>>but 
>>>not the applications that rely upon it.

on the same note, wouldn't it be trivial for mason to provide these light
wrappers themselves?  if in either case mason users would be expected to
upgrade it seems like mason itself could port over relatively quickly using
this approach.  certainly more quickly than it would take us to get RC6 out.

--Geoff

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to