Stas Bekman wrote: > [let's split this from the VOTE thread and have a dedicated thread] > >>>>>>[...] >> >> >> Yup, I am thinking: >> >> ModPerl::Util::unload_package_xs() >> ModPerl::Util::unload_package_pp() >> >> and >> ModPerl::Util::unload_package() as the user-visible, recommended one >> that just dispatches to _pp for now, until the xs implementation can >> be fixed (if it can) > > go for it.
Checked in as r169826, should have thought of this a long time ago, actually. Now we are back to where we were before, with the 'redefined' warnings but no segfaults. Definitely better. > should probably document the availability of the _xs for the brave ones. > After all it does work in some cases :0) Yup, will at least document it exists ;-) And really, the reason it's broken is because we cache GV's ;-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
