Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Geoffrey Young wrote: > >> shouldn't there be some kind of version requirements on special >> versions of >> those modules, then? or do are things broken now but visible, and the >> patches to the B:: modules fix the brokenness? > > Yes, I don't believe most of what I changed ever worked at least since RC5 > without these particulary the B::Terse stuff relying on > Apache::Status::noh_fileline. > > Also, the '-slow' option is now '-basic', for > B::Terse(deprecated)/B::Concise(newer) > so anything that used that doesn't work. > > Thats why I set/upped the version of a lot of the B modules requirements > in the ARRAY of HASHES. > > I was thinking of do a lot of screenshots and adding them to the docs > section for this and updating/syncing > the mp1/mp2 sections as the documentation requests. > > If it helps, I can break the patch down into sets and explain each?
nah - I, at least, am fine with whatever you're doing here, as you may be the only active user of these tools at this point, so if what you're doing is getting broken stuff to work I'm completely fine with it :) --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
